Search
August 16, 2023 | 15 min read
Four regional leaders from HarbourVest’s global Primary Investment team share their insights on the current state of venture capital, why investment in venture remains vibrant despite market volatility, and where opportunities in venture capital lie going forward. Read below to see where they believe the innovation cycle is taking venture capital in 2023 and beyond.
Q What have you been seeing broadly in terms of venture valuations?
Scott Voss (US): Private markets typically mute and lag public markets, and when there is unusually high volatility with short term swings it is difficult to anchor on true fair market value. Many of the markdowns that we saw in 2022 were a result of public positions connected to recent IPO activity trading down significantly (a true mark-to-market based on public market value at quarter end). On the private side, we saw managers proactively make valuation adjustments that were reflective of the public market correction. To date, there have not been many down rounds; write downs have been proactive with managers driven by public market comp adjustments. So, while private markets took a more gradual and muted path relative to public markets, as is typical, we saw NAV declines during 2022 ranging from -10% to -30% depending on the stage and maturity of investments.
There was also less consistency in managers’ approaches to this private company mark-to-market exercise. Because many venture-backed companies raised large rounds of financing pre-correction and then reduced cash burn to extend their cash runway post correction, they have not had to return to the private markets to raise subsequent capital and test their current private market valuations. We think 2024 will be a big year for companies going back out to the market to raise their next round and this will test the legitimacy of current carrying values.
Amanda Outerbridge (US): With continued public market volatility, there is an uncertainty that hangs over valuations in 2023. Fundamentals have always been important, but over the last few years we have seen returns generated from hypergrowth companies where the path to profitability was far into the future. Today, there has been a shift away from “growth at all costs” and a heightened focus on viable, disciplined business models that can achieve profitability in the medium/near term.
Late-stage venture capital and growth equity have been most impacted by re-ratings in valuations as public market comparables impact this end of the market more than early-stage and seed. As later stage activity has declined, managers have become increasingly active at the earlier end of the market. Early stage valuations have remained more stable and seed valuations have modestly risen. We believe the early stages continue to offer attractive entry points for investors where they can access the next generation of category leaders and gain high ownership to drive outsized returns.
Alex Wolf (Europe): The valuation environment in Europe is similar to what Scott and Amanda described in the US. European venture managers are adapting their valuation methodology to today’s market and in many cases are taking discretionary mark-downs from the last round valuation to reflect company performance and reduced multiples for comparable businesses. Thus, in Europe we have seen very few down rounds to date.
That said, we have seen some contrast in the valuation picture. There are some exceptional companies that are earlier stage growth businesses raising money at higher valuations than their last round of funding, despite the challenging environment.
Lydia Hao (Asia): Venture valuations in Asia took a similar path as their global counterparts. However, the magnitude of adjustments, both on the up and the down, have been lower. Compared to US and European venture markets, venture-backed companies in Asia saw more muted valuation uplifts during 2020-2021, resulting in less adjustment in 2022 and into 2023. Meanwhile, many businesses are aggressively reducing cash burn and focusing on unit economics to weather the current pullback in venture funding. For those companies that must return to market, we often hear “flat round is the new up round” and new investors are able to secure more favorable deal terms.
Despite the pressure on valuations, many late-stage companies in Asia continue to deliver strong organic growth and improving operating metrics, demonstrating the resilience of founders and the attractive market fundamentals more broadly across Asia.
Managing Director
Managing Director
Managing Director
Managing Director
Q Why is now a good time to invest in venture?
Alex Wolf: Two words: innovation cycles. Innovation equals new company creation – the lifeblood of the venture industry. While macro headwinds do pose a challenge in the short term for the funding and financing of venture portfolio companies, the long-term outcome of truly great businesses is less impacted by these factors. For example, Airbnb, Slack, Instagram, Wise, and Farfetch were all conceived during times of macro headwinds, yet they represent some of the most successful venture-backed companies ever created. Fundamentally, when companies are built to disrupt incumbents and incumbent business models with a focus on “better, faster, and cheaper,” they are less impacted by macroeconomic factors.
We believe the current macro uncertainty creates a healthy consolidation across all stakeholders in the venture capital value chain – including entrepreneurs, portfolio companies, and managers – because it eliminates the “tourists.” Only the strongest companies will survive when capital is less abundant and there is more time for due diligence (as fundraising and investment pacing return to more normalized levels). Venture capital remains the most effective way to access future market leaders, and the current choppy market environment is setting up the next wave of venture disruption.
Source: HarbourVest Partners. For illustrative purposes only.
Lydia Hao: The previous innovation cycle in Asia gave rise to many highly recognizable venture-backed consumer internet platforms across markets. The existing infrastructure has matured, acting as a multiplier for next generation ideas, bringing about both vertical specialization and horizontal integrations. This is driving the next cycle of innovation which we believe will be broader across a different set of sectors in Asia, such as software services, biotechnology, advanced manufacturing, and energy transition.
From an asset allocation perspective, this is also an opportune time to consider Asia venture as the relative bargaining power has shifted from GPs to LPs, and we are seeing several LP-favorable dynamics that had not existed before, including:
These factors are further enhanced by the significant corrections in entry valuations across sectors, given lower levels of competition among venture capitalists for deal allocation. Again, in times of market dislocation and uncertainty, we believe these conditions can be true tests of founders’ grit and conviction behind their next big ideas.
Scott Voss: It really is all about the innovation cycle. Two innovations that have driven venture returns over the last 15 years are the creation of the iPhone and the shift to the cloud in the enterprise software space. The introduction and broad adoption of the iPhone put a computer in each of our hands and forever changed the way we access information, communicate with each other, and function as consumers. Some of the most notable venture-backed outcomes of the last decade are apps that live on our phone (think Google, Facebook, Uber, and others).
Similarly, the migration to a cloud-based subscription model has forever changed the software industry. Cloud infrastructure built by Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Alibaba Cloud has facilitated business model innovation in the enterprise software space, moving leading software providers off premise and migrating expensive licensing pricing models to pay as you go SaaS models. This innovation has taken friction and expense out of the purchase decision, allowing for broad adoption. The resulting mission critical software solutions have blossomed into very successful venture-backed companies (including Salesforce, Workday, and Zoom).
Innovation cycles that we are excited about looking forward include AI, cybersecurity, and regenerative medicine, to name a few. We believe it is possible that these themes will have market defining impacts on the venture industry, similar to the iPhone and cloud.
Q Where is venture headed in 2023 and beyond?
Amanda Outerbridge: Change creates the opportunity to reimagine, improve, and disrupt. There are a number of future areas of disruption that are showing promising signs of growth and transformation in durable segments today. There is significant excitement around artificial intelligence right now, and a question we often receive is whether there is real value there or if it’s just another fad. We view the recent technology breakthroughs within AI as creating fundamental, lasting value that provides an expansive and growing opportunity set. Two of the reasons we believe this are the dramatically reduced costs of modeling and the rapid adoption of AI products.
Like other nascent technologies, the key is being able to work with managers that have been early leaders in AI who can weed through the hype and the noise to find the next-gen leaders across these disruptive technologies. Within AI, there are three broad categories where venture capitalists are investing:
When you have new, big, emerging technology platforms, they can catalyze the ascension of technology hubs. For example, we have seen this across North America in Silicon Valley, Boston, and New York and are seeing it more recently in Toronto and Montreal.
Venture managers also continue to invest in cybersecurity, where constant innovation is needed to combat new vulnerabilities. Healthcare continues to be a durable sector where we see GPs investing in technologies, tools, and services to reduce costs, improve the patient experience, and support healthcare workers. The biotech revolution marches on with new methods of drug discovery and precision medicine. Fintech is another expanding market segment, and we continue to see strength in financial infrastructure, which is an area that is more mature along with new areas like decentralized finance and blockchain.
Lydia Hao: Asia is home to the second largest venture capital ecosystem globally after the US, with more than 400 unicorns spread across core markets of China, India, and Southeast Asia.5 In recent years, we have been closely observing Asia-focused managers evolve and build on their sector capabilities to capture next-gen sector leaders in:
Last but not least, we are equally excited about the field of generative AI across Asia, which could have far-reaching impacts that intersect all of the sector themes discussed above. When it comes to China, however, investors do need to navigate more geopolitical complexities. In August 2023, the Biden Administration unveiled an Executive Order aimed at restricting US outbound investments in a narrow set of advanced technology sectors in China (such as advanced semiconductors, quantum computing and artificial intelligence). Though this action was widely expected by the industry, we will continue to actively monitor the development of more detailed rules and assess their potential impact.
The long-term growth drivers for Asia’s venture opportunity set remain strong and we believe technology-driven solutions will continue to transform both consumer and enterprise-facing businesses uniquely tailored to Asian demands.
Alex Wolf: Europe continues to embed its position as a globally important center for innovation and entrepreneurship, with a positively reinforcing ecosystem of government sponsorship, repeat founders, and an increasingly distributed track record of success across the European continent. What is unique to Europe is that there is no Silicon Valley equivalent, so innovation and company creation has fanned out across the continent. We have now seen tech start-ups with assets greater than $1 billion founded in more than 50 cities across Europe.3 These large, category-defining companies are producing a strong supply of repeat founders and ex-operators, which makes for a higher quality entrepreneurial base than we’ve ever had in Europe. As an example, we’ve now seen more than 30 start-ups created by ex-employees from Spotify alone.4
The size, quality, and dispersion of the market opportunity in Europe also means that top tier global venture firms are feeling the need to establish a physical presence in Europe. We’ve seen this come to pass over the last few years with firms like Sequoia, General Catalyst, and Bessemer. Most recently, Andreesen Horowitz announced plans to open a London office.
Generative AI is clearly a key investment theme going forward in Europe, building on several years of investment into AI and machine learning given the strong engineering and technical talent base available in Europe. Europe also continues to lead the way in climate tech, sustainability, and purpose-driven investment themes such as:
The entrepreneurship and disruption that has fueled venture capital since it became an institutional asset class over 70 years ago persists today. As new innovation cycles emerge, upper quartile venture capital is poised to continue to lead the way in private market performance, presenting investors an opportunity to achieve very strong returns.
Source: Burgiss, Bloomberg, HarbourVest as December 31, 2021. Returns are 10-year IRRs for private assets and 10-year annualized compound returns for public market assets. Public Equity reflects Bloomberg universe of 223 US-registered global equity mutual funds. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
As always, skillful manager selection is critical to maximizing expected returns of a private market portfolio – and access to top managers is especially important for venture capital, which tends to have a wider return dispersion than other private market segments and public markets.
Would you like to discuss current opportunities in venture capital?
This material is solely for informational purposes and should not be viewed as a current or past recommendation or an offer to sell or the solicitation to buy securities or adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed herein represent the current, good faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication, are not definitive investment advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This material has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, HarbourVest does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information. There is no assurance that any events or projections will occur, and outcomes may be significantly different than the opinions shown here. This information, including any projections concerning financial market performance, is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons.
Skillful manager selection and access to top performing managers are critical in maximizing expected returns of a private portfolio
Source: Burgiss, Bloomberg, HarbourVest as December 31, 2021. Returns are 10-year IRRs for private assets and 10-year annualized compound returns for public market assets. Public Equity reflects Bloomberg universe of 223 US-registered global equity mutual funds. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
“Professional Investor” under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) (the “SFO”) and its subsidiary legislation) means:
(a) any recognised exchange company, recognised clearing house, recognised exchange controller or recognised investor compensation company, or any person authorised to provide automated trading services under section 95(2) of the SFO;
(b) any intermediary, or any other person carrying on the business of the provision of investment services and regulated under the law of any place outside Hong Kong;
(c) any authorized financial institution, or any bank which is not an authorised financial institution but is regulated under the law of any place outside Hong Kong;
(d) any insurer authorized under the Insurance Ordinance (Cap. 41 of the Laws of Hong Kong), or any other person carrying on insurance business and regulated under the law of any place outside Hong Kong;
(e) any scheme which-
(i) is a collective investment scheme authorised under section 104 of the SFO; or
(ii) is similarly constituted under the law of any place outside Hong Kong and, if it is regulated under the law of such place, is permitted to be operated under the law of such place,
or any person by whom any such scheme is operated;
(f) any registered scheme as defined in section 2(1) of the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance (Cap. 485 of the Laws of Hong Kong), or its constituent fund as defined in section 2 of the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes (General) Regulation (Cap. 485A of the Laws of Hong Kong), or any person who, in relation to any such registered scheme, is an approved trustee or service provider as defined in section 2(1) of that Ordinance or who is an investment manager of any such registered scheme or constituent fund;
(g) any scheme which-
(i) is a registered scheme as defined in section 2(1) of the Occupational Retirement Schemes Ordinance (Cap. 426 of the Laws of Hong Kong); or
(ii) is an offshore scheme as defined in section 2(1) of that Ordinance and, if it is regulated under the law of the place in which it is domiciled, is permitted to be operated under the law of such place,
or any person who, in relation to any such scheme, is an administrator as defined in section 2(1) of that Ordinance;
(h) any government (other than a municipal government authority), any institution which performs the functions of a central bank, or any multilateral agency;
(i) except for the purposes of Schedule 5 to the SFO, any corporation which is-
(i) a wholly owned subsidiary of-
(A) an intermediary, or any other person carrying on the business of the provision of investment services and regulated under the law of any place outside Hong Kong; or
(B) an authorized financial institution, or any bank which is not an authorised financial institution but is regulated under the law of any place outside Hong Kong;
(ii) a holding company which holds all the issued share capital of-
(A) an intermediary, or any other person carrying on the business of the provision of investment services and regulated under the law of any place outside Hong Kong; or
(B) an authorized financial institution, or any bank which is not an authorised financial institution but is regulated under the law of any place outside Hong Kong; or
(iii) any other wholly owned subsidiary of a holding company referred to in subparagraph (ii); or
(j) any person of a class which is prescribed by rules made under section 397 of the SFO for the purposes of this paragraph as within the meaning of this definition for the purposes of the provisions of the SFO, or to the extent that it is prescribed by rules so made as within the meaning of this definition for the purposes of any provision of the SFO.
The first of such classes of additional “professional investor”, under the Securities and Futures (Professional Investor) Rules (Cap. 571D of the Laws of Hong Kong), are:
(k) any trust corporation (registered under Part VIII of the Trustee Ordinance (Cap. 29 of the Laws of Hong Kong) or the equivalent overseas) having been entrusted under the trust or trusts of which it acts as a trustee with total assets of not less than HK$40 million or its equivalent in any foreign currency at the relevant date (see below) or-
(i) as stated in the most recent audited financial statement prepared-
(A) in respect of the trust corporation; and
(B) within 16 months before the relevant date;
(ii) as ascertained by referring to one or more audited financial statements, each being the most recent audited financial statement, prepared-
(A) in respect of the trust or any of the trust; and
(B) within 16 months before the relevant date; or
(iii) as ascertained by referring to one or more custodian (see below) statements issued to the trust corporation-
(A) in respect of the trust or any of the trusts; and
(B) within 12 months before the relevant date;
(l) any individual, either alone or with any of his associates (the spouse or any child) on a joint account, having a portfolio (see below) of not less than HK$8 million or its equivalent in any foreign currency at the relevant date or-
(i) as stated in a certificate issued by an auditor or a certified public accountant of the individual within 12 months before the relevant date; or
(ii) as ascertained by referring to one or more custodian statements issued to the individual (either alone or with the associate) within 12 months before the relevant date;
(m) any corporation or partnership having-
(i) a portfolio of not less than HK$8 million or its equivalent in any foreign currency; or
(ii) total assets of not less than HK$40 million or its equivalent in any foreign currency, at the relevant date, or as ascertained by referring to-
(iii) the most recent audited financial statement prepared-
(A) in respect of the corporation or partnership (as the case may be); and
(B) within 16 months before the relevant date; or
(iv) one or more custodian statements issued to the corporation or partnership (as the case may be) within 12 months before the relevant date; and
(n) any corporation the sole business of which is to hold investments and which at the relevant date is wholly owned by any one or more of the following persons-
(i) a trust corporation that falls within the description in paragraph (k);
(ii) an individual who, either alone or with any of his or her associates on a joint account, falls within the description in paragraph (k);
(iii) a corporation that falls within the description in paragraph (m);
(iv) a partnership that falls within the description in paragraph (m).
For the purposes of paragraphs (k) to (n) above:
An institutional investor as defined in Section 4A of the SFA and Securities and Futures (Classes of Investors) Regulations 2018 is:
(a) the Singapore Government;
(b) a statutory board as may be prescribed by regulations made under section 341 of the SFA, as prescribed in the Second Schedule of the Securities and Futures (Classes of Investors) Regulations 2018;
(c) an entity that is wholly and beneficially owned, whether directly or indirectly, by a central government of a country and whose principal activity is —
(i) to manage its own funds;
(ii) to manage the funds of the central government of that country (which may include the reserves of that central government and any pension or provident fund of that country); or
(iii) to manage the funds (which may include the reserves of that central government and any pension or provident fund of that country) of another entity that is wholly and beneficially owned, whether directly or indirectly, by the central government of that country;
(d) any entity —
(i) that is wholly and beneficially owned, whether directly or indirectly, by the central government of a country; and
(ii) whose funds are managed by an entity mentioned in sub‑paragraph (c);
(e) a bank that is licensed under the Banking Act 1970;
(f) a merchant bank that is licensed under the Banking Act 1970;
(g) a finance company that is licensed under the Finance Companies Act 1967;
(h) a company or co‑operative society that is licensed under the Insurance Act 1966 to carry on insurance business in Singapore;
(i) a company licensed under the Trust Companies Act 2005;
(j) a holder of a capital markets services licence;
(k) an approved exchange;
(l) a recognised market operator;
(m) an approved clearing house;
(n) a recognised clearing house;
(o) a licensed trade repository;
(p) a licensed foreign trade repository;
(q) an approved holding company;
(r) a Depository as defined in section 81SF of the SFA;
(s) a pension fund, or collective investment scheme, whether constituted in Singapore or elsewhere;
(t) a person (other than an individual) who carries on the business of dealing in bonds with accredited investors or expert investors;
(u) a designated market‑maker as defined in paragraph 1 of the Second Schedule to the Securities and Futures (Licensing and Conduct of Business) Regulations;
(v) a headquarters company or Finance and Treasury Centre which carries on a class of business involving fund management, where such business has been approved as a qualifying service in relation to that headquarters company or Finance and Treasury Centre under section 43D(2)(a) or 43E(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act 1947;
(w) a person who undertakes fund management activity (whether in Singapore or elsewhere) on behalf of not more than 30 qualified investors;
(x) a Service Company (as defined in regulation 2 of the Insurance (Lloyd’s Asia Scheme) Regulations) which carries on business as an agent of a member of Lloyd’s;
(y) a corporation the entire share capital of which is owned by an institutional investor or by persons all of whom are institutional investors;
(z) a partnership (other than a limited liability partnership within the meaning of the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2005) in which each partner is an institutional investor.
An accredited investor as defined in Section 4A of the SFA and Securities and Futures (Classes of Investors) Regulations 2018 is:
(i) an individual —
(A) whose net personal assets exceed in value $2 million (or its equivalent in a foreign currency) or such other amount as the Authority may prescribe in place of the first amount;
(B) whose financial assets (net of any related liabilities) exceed in value $1 million (or its equivalent in a foreign currency) or such other amount as the Authority may prescribe in place of the first amount, where “financial asset” means —
(BA) a deposit as defined in section 4B of the Banking Act 1970;
(BB) an investment product as defined in section 2(1) of the Financial Advisers Act 2001; or
(BC) any other asset as may be prescribed by regulations made under section 341; or
(C) whose income in the preceding 12 months is not less than $300,000 (or its equivalent in a foreign currency) or such other amount as the Authority may prescribe in place of the first amount;
(ii) a corporation with net assets exceeding $10 million in value (or its equivalent in a foreign currency) or such other amount as the Authority may prescribe, in place of the first amount, as determined by —
(A) the most recent audited balance sheet of the corporation; or
(B) where the corporation is not required to prepare audited accounts regularly, a balance sheet of the corporation certified by the corporation as giving a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the corporation as of the date of the balance sheet, which date must be within the preceding 12 months;
(iii) A trustee of a trust which all the beneficiaries are accredited investors; or
(iv) A trustee of a trust which the subject matter exceeds S$10 million; or
(v) An entity (other than a corporation) with net assets exceeding S$10 million (or its equivalent in a foreign currency) in value. “Entity” includes an unincorporated association, a partnership and the government of any state, but does not include a trust; or
(vi) A partnership (other than a limited liability partnership) in which every partner is an accredited investor; or
(vii) A corporation which the entire share capital is owned by one or more persons, all of whom are accredited investors.
Continuation solutions encompass a host of transaction types in which a GP secures interim liquidity and/or additional primary capital for their LPs in a strongly performing asset, or set of assets, that the GP will continue to own and control. Specifically, they include continuation funds, new funds created by GPs for the purpose of acquiring the asset(s) that continue to be managed by the same GP and capitalized by one or several secondary buyers, or equity recapitalizations involving a direct equity or structured equity investment into a portfolio company. These transactions can also include a parallel investment from the GP’s latest fund into that same pool of assets (a “cross-fund trade”).
Q&A 
