
Why LPs are selling private credit: The liquidity they expected never came
Average direct lending fund has taken 10 years to cross a 1.0x DPI
Source: Preqin Alternative Assets Data and Intelligence, DPI Data by Vintage, as of 9/29/2025.
Key takeaway
Diverging liquidity expectations and actual loan repayments are driving a surge in credit secondaries, as investors seek new solutions to access liquidity.
In our discussions around the rapidly emerging credit secondaries market, one recurring question we hear is, “What motivates the sale of private credit, with its steady cash flow, short duration, and self-amortizing features?” While many LPs sell for familiar reasons—such as strategic portfolio realignment, leadership changes, or managing allocation targets—one of the most pressing drivers in today’s credit secondaries market is a mismatch between liquidity expectations and reality.
Generally, most direct lending funds have 5-7 year terms,1 leading LPs to expect full capital return within that period. Consequently, one would expect a direct lending fund’s DPI (distributed to paid-in) multiple to approach its expected terminal value (generally ~1.3x paid-in capital) by year six.2 Yet, for 2019 vintage funds (six-years old), the average DPI is just 0.6x.
Based on our experience underwriting direct credit opportunities on the HarbourVest platform, the average private credit loans are generally expected be repaid in about three years. However, as private equity hold periods have lengthened, loan repayments—typically triggered by company sales—have slowed considerably. This has led to NAV build-up in portfolios when LPs expected cash distributions, prompting increased demand for liquidity.
This liquidity mismatch – alongside the emergence of dedicated pools of capital targeting the opportunity – has led to exponential growth in the credit secondaries market, with transaction volume expected to double from $10 billion in 2024 to nearly $20 billion this year.3 Given the strong growth in private credit and rapid adoption, we believe we are in the earliest innings of this emerging market.
The HarbourVest advantage
Morningstar, Why Private Direct Lending Is an Attractive Alternative to Public Securities, Nov. 2014.
Preqin Alternative Assets Data and Intelligence, DPI Data by Vintage, as of 9/29/2025.
- Source: Jefferies Boardroom Intelligence, “A Dramatic Shift in The Credit Secondaries Market– Continuation Vehicles Become Mainstream,” July 8, 2025.
HarbourVest Partners, LLC is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. This material is solely for informational purposes and should not be viewed as a current or past recommendation or an offer to sell or the solicitation to buy securities or adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed herein represent the current, good faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication, are not definitive investment advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This material has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, HarbourVest does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of such information. There is no assurance that any events or projections will occur, and outcomes may be significantly different than the opinions shown here. This information, including any projections concerning financial market performance, is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. The information contained herein must be kept strictly confidential and may not be reproduced or redistributed in any format without the express written approval of HarbourVest.
Nothing herein should be construed as a solicitation, offer, recommendation, representation of suitability, legal advice, tax advice, or endorsement of any security or investment and should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in HarbourVest funds or in any other investment decision.
Credit Secondaries Investing Risks. Investments into secondary investments in Underlying Portfolio Funds focusing primarily on senior secured credit investments include risks related to both secondary market transactions generally as well as risks specific to such credit investments will apply with respect to a portfolio. Secondary market transactions may impose higher costs than other investments and may require a portfolio to assume contingent liabilities associated with events occurring prior to the investment. The overall performance of an investment in an Underlying Portfolio Fund acquired through a secondary transaction will depend in large part on the purchase price paid. In addition, the portfolio will generally not have any ability to negotiate terms with respect to interests in Underlying Portfolio Funds acquired through secondary market transactions. Investments in senior secured credit investment portfolios through its Underlying Portfolio Fund investments will expose a portfolio to credit risk, which is the risk that a borrower will be unable or unwilling to make principal and interest payments on its outstanding debt obligations when due. Adverse changes in the financial condition of a borrower and general economic conditions (or both) could impair the ability of a borrower to make payments on its senior debt and result in defaults on, and declines in, the value of such debt as well as, potentially, the collateral securing it. There is no assurance that such collateral will be sufficient to mitigate the losses incurred as a result of defaults.