
Co-investment Funds: Key to Building a Diversified Private Markets Core
- Strategy insight
July 30, 2025 | 5 min read
Limited partners (LPs) have been operating in a capital-constrained environment for several years as macroeconomic volatility has contributed to reduced distribution and exit activity. Many investors have been driven to make difficult capital deployment choices, including consolidating the number of general partners (GPs) with whom they do business and limiting re-ups to existing core manager relationships. As a result, portfolio-level diversification could suffer, potentially leading to higher overall risk profiles in private markets portfolios.
We believe direct co-investment funds can help provide needed diversification to LPs investing with a limited subset of managers. Below we examine the current co-investing landscape, assess whether the number of underlying companies in a direct co-investment fund affects performance, and show how increasing direct co-investment allocations can improve portfolio performance.
Why co-investing is gaining traction with GPs and LPs alike
Traditional private equity GPs are facing fundraising challenges with today’s LPs investing fewer new dollars relative to the past few years. Longer fundraising cycles are also causing many GPs to turn to co-investment dollars to complete deals and deepen relationships with select LPs.
US PE fundraising activity
Source: PitchBook, Q2 US PE Breakdown, data as of June 30, 2025.
At the same time, LPs have been navigating lower distributions and investing in fewer funds, which is impacting the diversification and risk profile of their broader portfolios. As LPs reduce the number of GPs and deals held in their portfolio, concentration increases along with exposure to similar styles, geographies, sectors, and vintages. The impact in the current environment is clear—as LPs reduce their GP rosters, portfolio concentration increases, potentially reducing risk-adjusted returns and increasing the likelihood of underperformance.
Co-investment funds can provide exposure to a wide variety of managers with a single fund commitment, access to high-quality transactions at reduced fee and carry levels, and the potential for enhanced diversification and improved risk-adjusted returns.
A deeper dive into direct co-investment fund diversification data
A direct co-investment is an investment made alongside another party or group into a single company. While a single co-investment can be a valuable contributor to a private markets portfolio, individual co-investments do not provide the same diversification benefits as a broadly diversified co-investment fund. Direct co-investment funds offer a single-ticket method for investing in a diversified portfolio that can include upwards of 60-80 companies accessed through 40-50 GPs across different sectors, vintages, and geographies.
The following analysis displays this more nuanced principle by evaluating a direct co-investment allocation in a range of six to 50 companies. We see that increasing the number of companies in a US buyout co-investment portfolio can potentially increase risk-adjusted returns, as measured by Sortino ratio. Further, the probability of returns falling below the 1.5x hurdle rate is significantly higher in the six-company portfolio (24%) relative to a 3% probability of underperformance in the portfolio with 50 companies. In short, we see the dispersion of returns and the risk of underperformance decrease as the number of companies increases.
US buyout co-investment portfolio 10-year TVPI by company count
Source: HarbourVest. Not representative of any HarbourVest fund, account, and not representative of any HarbourVest experience. For illustrative purposes only. The graphic and data above are based on a historical Monte Carlo simulation as of August 2022. Simulation parameters include co-investment vintage years for 2004-2018. Three-year even allocation, 100% US/100% buyout. Calculations are net of management fees of 1.0% and 12.5% carried interest for third-party funds and gross of HarbourVest management fees and carried interest. Other expenses borne by investors in the HarbourVest managed funds / accounts may reduce returns. The Sortino ratio is a calculation of the expected return, or minimal acceptable return (MAR), divided by downside deviation, and similar to the Sharpe ratio, the higher the Sortino ratio the better. Sortino in this simulation assumes a minimum acceptable return (MAR/hurdle) of 1.5x for TVPI. Interquartile range is the difference between the upper quartile (75th percentile) and the lower quartile (25th percentile). Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Implementing a co-investment strategy
Taking the next step in the portfolio construction process, we can now evaluate the impact of adding a diversified co-investment fund to a broader portfolio. Our simulation shows that as larger co-investment allocations are added to a primary portfolio both risk and return improve. In fact, relative to a 100% primary portfolio with a TVPI of 2.07x, allocating 30% of the portfolio to direct co-investment can potentially increase absolute returns to 2.14x and significantly reduce the probability of returns below the 1.5x hurdle rate.
Primary portfolio 12-year TVPI with differing co-investment allocations
Source: HarbourVest proprietary data set comprised of information aggregated from multiple data sources, including HarbourVest and third-party data providers. Not representative of any HarbourVest fund, account, and not representative of any HarbourVest experience. The graphic and data above are based on a forward-looking Monte Carlo simulation as of June 2025. Simulation Parameters: Co-investment: Vintage years for TVPI 2004 – 2018; Three-year investment period, 60% North America, 30% Europe, 10% Asia; 100% Buyout. Returns are net of management fee of 1.0% and 12.5% carried interest on realized returns for third-party funds and gross of HarbourVest management fees and carried interest. Other expenses borne by investors in the HarbourVest managed funds / accounts may reduce returns. The Sortino ratio is a calculation of the expected return, or minimal acceptable return (MAR), divided by downside deviation, and similar to the Sharpe ratio, the higher the Sortino ratio the better. Sortino in this simulation assumes a minimum acceptable return (MAR/hurdle) of 1.5x for TVPI. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Collectively, these analyses show that a co-investment fund commitment can provide LPs with the potential for enhanced diversification, improved risk-adjusted returns, and better exposure to a wide variety of managers—all of which are critical to balancing the effects of shrinking GP rosters due to ongoing liquidity challenges and an uncertain macroeconomic outlook.
Connect with HarbourVest
Key takeaways
We believe broadly diversified co-investment funds play an important role as a core allocation in any private markets portfolio. Near-term, they can be a valuable tool for LPs in a difficult market environment by providing timely and valuable diversification benefits. As GPs continue to navigate longer fundraising cycles, we expect they will continue to offer significant co-investment opportunities going forward.
Market dislocations can create distinct opportunities for direct co-investments, but not all co-investment funds are created equal. There are several factors to consider when choosing a co-investment fund, including stage and geographic exposure, tenure of the investment team, and the optimal number of underlying portfolio companies. In addition to these factors, it is critical for co-investment managers to have strong GP relationships, access to robust deal flow from top-tier sponsors, and deep due diligence resources to evaluate and execute on multiple opportunities across the globe at any given time.
HarbourVest Partners, LLC is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. This material is solely for informational purposes and should not be viewed as a current or past recommendation or an offer to sell or the solicitation to buy securities or adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed herein represent the current, good faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication, are not definitive investment advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This material has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, HarbourVest does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of such information. There is no assurance that any events or projections will occur, and outcomes may be significantly different than the opinions shown here. This information, including any projections concerning financial market performance, is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. The information contained herein must be kept strictly confidential and may not be reproduced or redistributed in any format without the express written approval of HarbourVest.
Nothing herein should be construed as a solicitation, offer, recommendation, representation of suitability, legal advice, tax advice, or endorsement of any security or investment and should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in HarbourVest funds or in any other investment decision.
Historical Monte Carlo Simulations: These model (hypothetical) portfolios, if shown, are intended for illustrative purposes only. Performance information for each hypothetical portfolio utilized a Monte Carlo Simulation and are based on the actual cash flows of a proprietary data set that includes partnership investments made by Funds, along with partnership data from external sources. The capital calls and distribution data is based on historic partnership investment cash flows, but does not represent the actual experience of any investor or Fund. The results of the simulation are impacted by an uneven representation of funds with different vintage years, sizes, managers, and strategies, and a limited pool of investment cash flow data. The actual pace and timing of cash flows is likely to be different and will be highly dependent on the underlying partnerships’ commitment pace, the types of investments made by the Fund(s), market conditions, and terms of any relevant management agreements. The results presented are hypothetical and based entirely on the output from numerous mathematical simulations. The simulations are unconstrained by the fund size, market opportunity, and minimum commitment amount, and do not take into account the practical aspects of raising and managing a fund. The simulated hypothetical portfolio results should be used solely as a guide and should not be relied upon to manage your investments or make investment decisions.
Forward Looking Monte Carlo Simulations: The information presented herein is intended for illustrative purposes only. Performance and cash flow information are forecasted utilizing a Monte Carlo Simulation which incorporates forward looking market parameters calibrated using an industry level historical dataset. The performance information does not represent the actual experience of any investor or Fund. The results of the simulation are impacted by the composition of the historical dataset, which may include an uneven representation of funds with different vintage years, sizes, managers, and strategies, and a limited pool of investment cash flow data. The actual pace and timing of cash flows is likely to be different and will be highly dependent on the underlying partnerships’ commitment pace, the types of investments made by the Fund(s), market conditions, and terms of any relevant management agreements. The results presented are hypothetical and based entirely on the output from numerous mathematical simulations. The simulations are unconstrained by the fund size, market opportunity, and minimum commitment amount, and do not take into account the practical aspects of raising and managing a fund. The simulated hypothetical portfolio results should be used solely as a guide and should not be relied upon to manage your investments or make investment decisions.
Simulated Management Fee and Carry: (if shown) The simulated performance presented herein is hypothetical and does not reflect any actual fees or expenses experienced by a client or investor. Instead, the simulated performance utilizes model management fees and carry that are assumed for modeling purposes only and applied as described below. No actual client or investor attained the performance presented here. Management fees are calculated either based on committed or invested capital and applied to portfolio’s gross capital calls according to a specified fee rate and a fee term. Carry is accrued based on a specified carry rate and applied to a portfolio’s total value after the applicable carry hurdle rate is met. Accrued carry is applied to gross NAV. Carry starts being distributed (paid out of distributions) once committed capital has been returned to investors.