
Private Credit: Risk, Redemptions and a Reality Check
- Strategy insight
March 31, 2026 | 6 min read
Credit Compass Volume 3
Is private credit in crisis? Journalists certainly think so. Various stories have kept the asset class in the headlines: First Brands, Tricolor, redemptions from evergreen private credit funds, and the recent “SaaS apocalypse.” All this has led to increased scrutiny on private credit and its future as an asset class.
Senior private credit was born out of the Global Financial Crisis and has exhibited significant growth over the last 17 years without facing a deep default cycle.1 Over that period, senior private credit has generated annualized total returns of 7 – 11% since 2004 with approximately 3% default rates.2 In that environment, senior private credit has achieved attractive total returns and consistent excess returns relative to the public fixed income markets. Looking forward, we believe it’s important to separate the headlines from the facts of what has happened in the private credit market, starting in the fall of 2025.
What Actually Happened?
First Brands, an auto supplier, and Tricolor, a sub-prime automotive lender, both defaulted and filed for bankruptcy in September 2025.3 After these bankruptcies, JPMorgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon famously said, “I probably shouldn’t say this, but when you have one cockroach, there are probably more,” in reference to systemic risks in the private credit market.4
Ironically, First Brands and Tricolor were financed with broadly syndicated loans and asset-backed financing facilities. Although the private credit market had minimal exposure to these two companies, the press broadly associated it with them. This was exacerbated by MFS, a British mortgage company that failed in early 2026, also with minimal exposure to traditional senior private credit.5 However, more tangible signs of stress emerged in the private credit market after the bankruptcies of Renovo and Alacrity, which were traditional sponsor-backed private credit defaults and losses.6
After these business failures came the “SaaS apocalypse.” In February 2026, Anthropic’s release of autonomous legal and business workflow capabilities shifted the AI narrative from theoretical to a measurable reality.7 AI had been the proverbial iceberg in the distance for several years, but Anthropic’s developments brought it sharply into view for investors. Software, one of the largest sectors in the private credit market, was thrust into the limelight and many questioned the risk that could manifest out of this uncertainty.
Historically, software-related risk was often painted with a single brush stroke. However, AI is reshaping the software industry and has the potential to create bifurcated outcomes. On the one hand, AI can be a powerful value-creation lever, which can drive improvements in product differentiation, accelerate innovation cycles, and drive operational leverage through automation and productivity gains which can support faster growth and enhanced margins and profitability. For others, it can be a source of disruption, lowering barriers to entry for AI-native competitors to replicate features, commoditize products, lower switching costs, and erode value propositions.
HarbourVest’s Perspective: An Evolving Landscape for Private Credit
We believe that the private credit landscape is shifting – both in terms of 1) the risks that General Partners (GPs) need to underwrite and 2) the types of structures that now hold private credit, like evergreen vehicles, and their potential impact on market structure and valuations.
We believe that private credit remains a durable, all-weather asset class but, like other asset classes, it is not immune from cycles. We expect default rates to tick up modestly as the full impact of the AI disruption is fully digested by the market. Importantly, we also believe periods of market disruption create opportunity. While AI will disrupt a number of business models, we believe it can also catalyze growth for others.
When it comes to software, we believe that the winners of the AI shift will be companies with deep workflow integrations, strong data moats, and clear paths to embedding new technologies. Conversely, less integrated, more commoditized, and highly displaceable companies will see erosion and pressure from AI.
As a firm, we have been investing in software businesses for decades and continue to evolve our process to adapt to the evolving market conditions and the growing impact of AI on our portfolio companies. We have implemented a framework to evaluate the potential impact from AI when we evaluate any business. We use the framework below to assess both existing and new software investments across four impact categories with an overall AI assessment. This approach gives a consistent lens for triangulating AI risk.
Connect with HarbourVest
The Path Ahead: Opportunities in Disguise
Over the last several years, the performance dispersion between private credit GPs has been between the wall and the wallpaper, as a result of a fairly benign credit environment and low default rates.9 In our view, this will change. Underwriting discipline and a GP’s ability to secure allocations to the highest-quality deals will become increasingly important.
Additionally, understanding the mechanics and the liquidity provisions of the vehicles that hold the assets will be critical. We think that in the coming years, it will become evident which managers have the ability to access the highest-quality deals in the market and which GPs have maintained underwriting discipline. Additionally, we believe it will be equally important to discern which GPs are taking a proactive approach to liquidity management rather than a reactive approach to meet redemptions in the evergreen market.
We believe that broad market disruptions can actually be viewed as opportunities in disguise. The private credit market is looking for liquidity providers, as evergreen funds run redemption management exercises to re-evaluate potential liquidity needs. This is creating an incredible opportunity for credit secondary managers to provide liquidity in a liquidity-starved market, at attractive purchase prices and with the ability to create highly customized liquidity solutions. While some GPs are avoiding software due to recent market turmoil, we think this creates opportunities to take a more nuanced view and evaluate how AI will impact an individual business – recognizing that while AI may disrupt a portion of the market, it can be viewed as a force multiplier to others.
- Source: Refinitiv LPC March 31, 2025.
- Sources: Annualized return range represents HarbourVest estimate based on Cliffwater Direct Lending Index total return of 9.55% since 2004; Default and Recovery Statistics – Private Lending (1994-2024).
- Source: U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York.
- Source: JP Morgan, Q3 25 Finaincal Report Earnings Call Transcript.
- Source: Reuters, “Wall Street hit by UK mortgage lender collapse, raising fears of more credit ‘cockroaches’.”
- Sources: Private Debt Investor, “A PE roll-up gone wrong and the lenders who feel the pain”; Bloomberg Law, “Private Lenders Set to Take Over Alacrity in Debt Restructuring.”
- Source: Reuters, “Anthropic touts new AI tools weeks after legal plug-in spurred market rout.”
- Source: PitchBook, “Private Credit and Middle Market Weekly Wrap ending March 12, 2026.”
- As of March 31, 2025. Source: Clearwater, “Another Strong Year for Private Debt.”
Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss.
HarbourVest Partners, LLC is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. This material is solely for informational purposes and should not be viewed as a current or past recommendation or an offer to sell or the solicitation to buy securities or adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed herein represent the current, good faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication, are not definitive investment advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This material has been developed internally and/or obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, HarbourVest does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of such information. There is no assurance that any events or projections will occur, and outcomes may be significantly different than the opinions shown here. This information, including any projections concerning financial market performance, is based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. The information contained herein must be kept strictly confidential and may not be reproduced or redistributed in any format without the express written approval of HarbourVest.
Nothing herein should be construed as a solicitation, offer, recommendation, representation of suitability, legal advice, tax advice, or endorsement of any security or investment and should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in HarbourVest funds or any other investment decision.
An investment in the private markets involves high degree of risk, and therefore, should be undertaken only by prospective investors capable of evaluating the risks of the Fund and bearing the risks such an investment represents. The following is a summary of only some of the risks of investing in private markets.
Risks Related to the Structure and Terms of a Private Markets Fund. Investments in a fund of funds structure may subject investors to additional risks which would not be incurred if such investor were investing directly in private equity funds. Such risks may include but are not limited to (i) multiple levels of expense; and (ii) reliance on third-party management. In addition, a fund may issue capital calls, and failure to meet the capital calls can result in consequences including, but not limited to, a total loss of investment.
Illiquidity of Interests; Limitations on Transfer; No Market for Interests. An investor in a HarbourVest-managed closed-end fund or account will generally not be permitted to transfer its interest without the consent of the general partner of such fund. Furthermore, the transferability of an interest will be subject to certain restrictions contained in the governing documents of a closed-end fund and will be affected by restrictions imposed under applicable securities laws. A HarbourVest-managed open-end fund or account will generally provide limited liquidity events for investors, subject to certain restrictions contained in the governing documents of an open-end fund and will be affected by restrictions imposed under applicable securities laws. There is currently no market for the interests in HarbourVest-managed funds or accounts, and it is not contemplated that one will develop. The interests should only be acquired by investors able to commit their funds for an indefinite period of time, as the term of the closed-end fund could continue for over 14 years. In addition, there are very few situations in which an investor may withdraw from a private equity closed-end fund. The possibility of total loss of an investment in a fund exists and prospective investors should not invest unless they can readily bear such a loss.
Risk of Loss. There can be no assurance that the operations of a strategy will be profitable or that the strategy will be able to avoid losses or that cash from operations will be available for distribution to the limited partners. The possibility of partial or total loss of capital of the strategy exists, and prospective investors should not subscribe unless they can readily bear the consequences of a complete loss of their investment.
Leverage. The strategy may use leverage in its investment strategy. Leverage may take the form of loans for borrowed money or derivative securities and instruments that are inherently leveraged, including options, futures, forward contracts, swaps and repurchase agreements. The strategy may use leverage to acquire, directly or indirectly, new investments. The use of leverage by the strategy can substantially increase the market exposure (and market risk) to which the strategies’ investment portfolio may be subject.
Availability of Suitable Investments. The business of identifying and structuring investments of the types contemplated by the strategy is competitive and involves a high degree of uncertainty. Furthermore, the availability of investment opportunities generally will be subject to market conditions and competition from other groups as well as, in some cases, the prevailing regulatory or political climate. Interest rates, general levels of economic activity, the price of securities and participation by other investors in the financial markets may affect the value and number of investments made by the strategy or considered for prospective investment.
Sustainable Investing. HarbourVest considers certain sustainable investing standards or metrics when evaluating investments as part of the larger goal of maximizing financial returns on investments. It should not be assumed that any sustainable investing initiatives, standards, or metrics utilized by HarbourVest will apply to each asset in which HarbourVest invests or that any sustainable investing initiatives, standards, or metrics were applicable to each of HarbourVest’s prior investments. Sustainable investing is only one of many considerations that HarbourVest takes into account when making investment decisions, and other considerations can be expected in certain circumstances to outweigh sustainable investing considerations. Any sustainable investing initiatives, standards or metrics will be implemented with respect to a portfolio investment solely to the extent HarbourVest determines such an initiative is consistent with its broader investment goals. Accordingly, certain investments may exhibit characteristics that are inconsistent with HarbourVest’s stated sustainability initiatives, standards, or metrics. Applying sustainable investing standards or metrics to investment decisions is qualitative and subjective by nature, and there is no guarantee that the criteria utilized by HarbourVest or any judgment exercised by HarbourVest in making an investment decision will reflect the sustainable investing-related beliefs or values of any particular investor or group of investors.
Reliance on the General Partner and Investment Manager. The success of the strategy will be highly dependent on the financial and managerial expertise of the Fund’s general partner and investment manager and their expertise in the relevant markets. The quality of results of the general partner and investment manager will depend on the quality of their personnel. There are risks that death, illness, disability, change in career or new employment of such personnel could adversely affect results of the strategy. The limited partners will not make decisions with respect to the acquisition, management, disposition or other realization of any investment, or other decisions regarding the strategies’ businesses and portfolio.
Market Risk. Private equity, as a form of equity capital, shares similar economic exposures as public equities. As such, investments in each can be expected to earn the equity risk premium, or compensation for assuming the non-diversifiable portion of equity risk. However, unlike public equity, private equity’s sensitivity to public markets is likely greatest during the late stages of the fund’s life because the level of equity markets around the time of portfolio company exits can negatively affect private equity realizations. Though private equity managers have the flexibility to potentially time portfolio company exits to complete transactions in more favorable market environments, there’s still the risk of capital loss from adverse financial conditions.
Incorporating artificial intelligence into the investment decision process. Recent technological advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning technology (collectively, “Machine Learning Technology”) and the reliance on Machine Learning Technology for investment and allocation decision making could pose risks to HarbourVest, the Fund and its portfolio companies or their respective affiliates. Machine Learning Technology is generally highly reliant on the collection and analysis of large amounts of data, and it may not be possible or practicable to incorporate all relevant data into any given model that Machine Learning Technology utilizes to operate. Additionally, certain data in such models will inevitably contain a degree of inaccuracy and error—potentially materially so—and could otherwise be inadequate or flawed, which would likely degrade the effectiveness of Machine Learning Technology. To the extent that HarbourVest, the Fund, or the portfolio companies utilize Machine Learning Technology and its applications, including in the private investment and financial sectors, continue to develop rapidly, and it is impossible to predict the future risks that may arise from such developments.
Potential Conflicts of Interest. The activities of the strategies may conflict with the activities of other HarbourVest-managed funds or accounts.
Tax Risks. An investment in the strategy involves tax risks, which may be material, including the risk of tax payments and tax filing obligations in multiple jurisdictions, which may apply both to the investor and the strategy. The taxation of the strategy and investors in the strategy is complex and subject to uncertainty. Prospective investors should consult with their tax, legal, and accounting advisers prior to making an investment in the strategy in light of their specific circumstances.
Credit Strategy Risks. A fundamental risk associated with credit investments is credit risk, which is the risk that a borrower will be unable or unwilling to make principal and interest payments on its outstanding debt obligations when due. Investments in subordinated or junior debt investments, should an issuer trigger an event of default, depending on the capital structure and the issuer’s financial situation, a loss of the entire value of the investment is possible. Adverse changes in the financial condition of an issuer or in general economic conditions (or both) could impair the ability of such issuer to make payments on its debt and result in defaults on, and declines in, the value of its subordinated debt more quickly than in the case of the senior debt obligations of such issuer. Adverse changes in the financial condition of an issuer or in general economic conditions (or both) could impair the ability of such issuer to make payments on its debt and result in defaults on, and declines in, the value of its subordinated debt more quickly than in the case of the senior debt obligations of such issuer.
More from HarbourVest


10 Deals that Defined Private Markets in 2025



